Bible Believers' Newsletter 659
"We focus on the present Truth —what Jesus is doing now. . ."
ISSN 1442-8660
Christian
greetings in the precious Name of our Lord Jesus Christ. It is good to be with you.
Please welcome our new 'part-time' contributing author, industrial engineer and full-time thinker, Brother James Kish, "a plain and simple faithful follower of my Lord Jesus Christ. What Jesus inspires me to do through the Holy Spirit—I do. At present time I am led to disciple. I am led to do His good works by whatever means He allows me to recognize. I am led to learn the Word of God and about the people and governments of this world as God leads me to question, to find answers and solve problems. My writings may be accessed from Kish Collections".
Last week we saw that our selected Governments do not govern, but merely control the machinery of government, being themselves controlled by the hidden hand, a revelation of Genesis 3:15 and the Trail of the Serpent. This world system is incurable and bound for the destruction. The Prophet said, "You put a George Washington or an Abraham Lincoln in every county in this United States, it still couldn't come back. It's beyond redemption" (Birth Pains, p. 16:5). In another place he said, "It's a million miles from being a Christian country. I don't even pray for it. How can I pray for it, and it won't repent under the mighty powers of God demonstrated before it, and denying, and closing the doors to it, and walking away? I commit it to God. And she's going further away, and now she's going to sink. Just watch what happens" (Trying to do God a Service without It being His Will, p. 23:136).
In "The Unconsidered Enemy," Brother Kish further exposes the work of the 'hidden hand' on the apostate (once) Christian world which having committed the unpardonable sin is without Spiritual discernment and set to fight against its own kindred of Adam's fallen race by the enemy of God and man. He observes, "The purpose of warfare is not to kill and maim your enemy; it is his social, economic, political, and religious reorientation. Somewhere Sun Tzu is smiling, and it is not at America." Don't skip the links in this Article.
Brother Branham said, "We had a great nation; but she is now rottening and crumbling and shaking and giving away, and trying to tax people to get money to send over yonder to buy friendship with our enemies. They're throwing it back in our face. One world war, two world wars, and still moving on to a third one. Certainly. Politics is rotten, corrupted, rotten to the bottom, just exactly what Matthew 24 said it would be: "Nation would be against nation, kingdom against kingdom" (This Day This Scripture is Fulfilled, p. 16:132).
Brother Kish shows how the 'hidden hand,' always working under another name and in a different occupation, controls both sides of the dialectic, capitalist or Communist, Semite or anti-Semite, good or bad, and "he plays for keeps." May we mean business, studying to show ourselves approved of God by rightly dividing the Word of Truth.
This Newsletter serves those of like precious faith. Whoever will receive the
truth is welcome to feed their soul from the waters of the River of Life.
Everything here presented should be confirmed personally in your own Bible.
Your brother-in-Christ, Anthony Grigor-Scott
7-7 Ripple Effect: Theorising Truth
In February 2009 a documentary film-maker Anthony John Hill alias Muad'Dib was arrested. He produced a film called "7/7 Ripple effect" about the 2005 London terrorist-attacks which were claimed to have been committed by four Muslims. The film shows without doubt that the alleged four Muslims could not possibly have done it, and that it was most probably done by the intelligence services, military and people in high positions in the UK government. . .
Muad'Dib mailed copies of the film to a court in the UK, where authorities were trying to convict three innocent people who were accusing of having helped the four alleged Muslim bombers, when it is clear the four could not have committed the atrocities as subsequently proven and all charges dismissed.
Irritated by Muad'Dib's film, the UK authorities applied for an European arrest warrant in 2008 and had the Irish authorities ransack his home early one morning, confiscate his computers and printer, and put him in jail for a number of days until bail was granted. . . Now the Supreme Court will hear the matter this Thursday November 11, 2010.
The charge against Muad'Dib carries a maximum of life imprisonment, which shows how aggravated they are because his film that exposes the London bombings for what they were: an inside-job to support illegal wars and create the illusion that Muslim radicals are threatening our way of life. . .
Full story: jamesfetzer.blogspot.com scribd.com
Comment: CIA interfering in Yemen as witnessed in false flag mail bomb HOAX proven NOT to have been mailed from Yemen. Yet taxpayer-funded alien propaganda continues to promote Al Qaeda as if it were anything more than a MOSSAD myth and CIA database.
Father of Eight in Prison for Historical Research
Since he resides in Belgium, France launched a European arrest warrant for Reynouard in order to make him serve the prison sentence ordered by the Colmar court. On July 9th he was imprisoned by the Belgian police, pending his extradition to France. All of which leads him to say: "When people can think of no other way but imprisonment to get rid of a verbal opponent, it's because they have no arguments." And nothing is said about this in the so-called free press!
Those who wish to sign this communiqué can send their names and contact information to eugenie.blanrue@laposte.net. It is not a question of supporting Vincent Reynouard's religious, political or historical ideas but of defending his right to express them. To challenge them, an open, democratic, fair and honest debate will suffice.
Full story: tellingfilms.netne.net
Fritz Springmeier released from Prison
October 28, 2010 — Fritz Springmeier researched and wrote "Satanic Bloodlines," and "The Illuminati Formula used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave" which struck a raw nerve within the thirteen families named. He was imprisoned in February 2003 for his involvement in a robbery, allegedly an FBI frame up. Once he finds employment in the Portland, Oregon, area, he will be released on five year's probation. Email: Fritz Springmeier
Ron Paul Supports the Pope and the Pope supports the NWO!
Before the US House of Representatives, April 6, 2005: Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to join my colleagues in paying tribute to the life and legacy of Pope John Paul II. Pope John Paul II was one of the great religious leaders of modern times, and an eloquent champion of human freedom and dignity. . . Full story: lewrockwell.com
April 12, 2005: Members of Congress from both political parties outdid themselves last week in heaping praise upon Pope John Paul II in the wake of his passing. . . The problem, however, is that so few of them honored him during his lifetime by their actions as legislators. In fact, most members of Congress support policies that are totally at odds with Catholic teachings. . .
Historically, religion always represented a threat to government because it competes for the loyalties of the people. In modern America, however, most religious institutions abandoned their independence long ago, and now serve as cheer leaders for state policies like social services, faith-based welfare, and military aggression in the name of democracy. Few American churches challenge state actions at all, provided their tax-exempt status is maintained. This is why Washington politicians ostensibly celebrate religion—it no longer threatens their supremacy. Government has co-opted religion and family as the primary organizing principle of our society. The federal government is boss, and everybody knows it. But no politician will ever produce even a tiny fraction of the legacy left by Pope John Paul II. Full story: lewrockwell.com
Vatican City, January 1, 2004 — Pope John Paul II rang in the New Year on Thursday with a renewed call for peace in the Middle East and Africa and the creation of a New World Order based on respect for the dignity of man and equality among nations.
John Paul presided over a morning Mass inside St. Peter's Basilica to mark the World Day of Peace, which the Roman Catholic Church celebrates every January 1.
. . Full story: scribd.com
'Holy Convocation' Convention, December 23 – 27
Spoken Word Tabernacle in Makurdi, Nigeria, cordially invite you to our Convention with meetings morning and evening focusing on the present Holy Convocation of the fiftieth day of the antitype of Israel's Pentecostal Feast following the fulfillment of the Seven Church Ages which were typed by the seven sabbaths of Israel's feast.
Please visit the link on the main page of this Website for schedule of meetings. For accommodation, location and other information, click esnips.com.
Why McDonalds Hamburgers, AND BUNS, won't Decompose
November 9, 2010 — One young man has a basement full of hamburgers that he started collecting back in 1989. None of them have decomposed in over two decades. Watch this video of Len Foley's Bionic Burger. Regular burgers and buns have mold all over them in just a matter of days, but not McDonalds'. The reason is the high content of sodium which 'preserves' the meat, for uh . . . 20 some years or more. Yummy . . . wonder what this does to our insides. No forget that, what does it do to our youngsters who crave this stuff because of fast foods' great commercials targeting our children? I'm a long time baker and confectioner, and I know how long fresh bread lasts, and McDonalds' 'fresh' hamburger buns, never ever deteriorate with mold or fungus like normal breads. Here's what McDonalds' own website says is in their buns:
Enriched flour (bleached wheat flour, malted barley flour, niacin, reduced iron, thiamin mononitrate, riboflavin, folic acid, enzymes), water, high fructose corn syrup, sugar, yeast, soybean oil and/or partially hydrogenated soybean oil, contains 2% or less of the following: salt, calcium sulfate, calcium carbonate, wheat gluten, ammonium sulfate, ammonium chloride, dough conditioners (sodium stearoyl lactylate, datem, ascorbic acid, azodicarbonamide, mono—and diglycerides, ethoxylated monoglycerides, monocalcium phosphate, enzymes, guar gum, calcium peroxide, soy flour), calcium propionate and sodium propionate (preservatives), soy lecithin. Full story: newswithviews.com
Why there has never been Another Jewish State in the Last 2000 Years
October 12, 2010 — The Israeli Cabinet has approved a law that requires new citizens to declare their loyalty to a "Jewish state." Furthermore, Prime Minister Netanyahu demands that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state as a prerequisite to halting settlement construction.
In defense of the new law, Netanyahu noted that "there is no other Jewish state in the world."
Actually, the fact that there is no other Jewish state is because it is un-Jewish to have a state. Throughout their 2000-year-long exile, Jews have had many opportunities to establish their own state, but they voluntarily refrained from doing so, knowing that G-d commanded them to wait for His redemption, via the messiah.
In about the year 132CE, Bar Kochba led a Jewish revolt against Rome and established a Jewish kingdom. The Talmud relates that Bar Kochba claimed to be the messiah. The Sages tested him, and when they were satisfied that he was not the messiah, they killed him. We see clearly that subsequent to the destruction of the Temple, the Talmudic Sages were against the existence of any Jewish state before the coming of the messiah.
In 1536, the Portuguese Inquisition was launched, and Jews became subject to severe persecution and public burnings. The Jews of Portugal saw an opportunity to take over the kingdom, but one old Jewish sage asked G-d, using a Kabbalistic method, if this was the right thing to do. G-d replied . . . Full story: jewsagainstzionism.com
Comment: There HAS been a Jewish state and homeland for the past 81 years called Birobidjan.
The Unconsidered Enemy
By J. N. Kish
Why is the United States fighting in Afghanistan? This simple question is difficult to answer with certainty. Without the benefit of top-secret clearance and connections, revealing the true answer is akin to solving a jigsaw puzzle while gloved and blindfolded. And that is the easy part. If one then happens upon the solution, proof of success is even more difficult—if not impossible. Nonetheless, this is the type of question that thinking men are compelled to solve.
In a real attempt to arrive at the truth, the breadcrumbs of logic have led me to ponder—What if our enemies want us in Afghanistan? What if we are actually playing into their hand?
Follow me through the logic. The three most common answers to the question "Why are we in Afghanistan?" are :
- We are in Afghanistan for control of the oil (pipelines). The article linked here explains this conclusion very well. Given the lay of the land and the location of the oil, this conclusion carries a lot of weight all on its own.
- We are in Afghanistan to feed the Military Industrial Complex (MIC). General Eisenhower warned us about the MIC all the way back in 1961. The text of General Eisenhower's famous MIC speech is linked here.
- We are in Afghanistan because the world is simply chaotic and our leaders are doing their best to control the rise of Islamic extremism. This is the "well-meaning" conclusion. It assumes that our leaders have moved troops into Afghanistan to gain a foothold in the heart of the "extremist" threat.
These answers share a repeated flaw of premise. In order to arrive at any of these conclusions, it is necessary to make an assumption about the strength of the United States. This assumption is typically made quickly and quietly as if driven by a subconscious thought—"We're number one."
The blind assumption is that of the United States as the world's sole superpower—capable of and responsible for directing the world's fate.
The United States has filled this role. However, this assumption can no longer be accepted as truth without reproach. As more and more US businesses freely hand over product designs, manufacturing equipment and trade secrets, our industrial and technological superiority is stripped away. Take a moment to digress from the act of counting nuclear warheads as the primary measure of national strength. Watch as a different view arises.
Recall that the United States became the most powerful country in the world and was victorious in World War II primarily through six key factors:
- Industrial strength
- Technological strength (cutting edge scientific research and development)
- Availability of necessary resources
- Military organization
- Effective use of espionage
- Effective development and deployment of nuclear weaponry
Weigh these six factors today. Watch as an alarming trend is uncovered. Communist nations are moving into the lead. Every day they gain strength. In fact, by measure of the six key factors, it is likely that China and Russia as a combined Communist axis would now be considered the most powerful nation on the globe.
If Communism faked its own death in 1991, as claimed by ex-KGB Major Anatoliy Golitsyn, the US is facing a greater challenge than most are willing to acknowledge. The apparent ruse has allowed the West to lower its guard. It opened the door for the Communists to access American corporate might. It has worked very well.
Sun Tzu—"I will force the enemy to take our strength for weakness, and our weakness for strength, and thus will turn his strength into weakness".
[Dimitri Manuilski—"The bourgeoisie will have to be put to sleep. So we will begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. . . The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to join in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down we will smash them with our clenched fist" (Daniel 8:25). Rome and Communism, though mortal enemies, share the same mother. While warning our deadly enemy is Romanism, which will rule to the consummation, the Prophet said, "WATCH RUSSIA, WATCH RUSSIA. Keep your eye on the King of the North" (An Exposition of the Seven Church Ages, p. 321:4); God has raised Judaeo-Communism to destroy the false church as He raised up Nebuchadnezzar to destroy apostate Judah. And when the Holy Roman Empire revives as Lucifer's totalitarian one world government its toes of clay will not cleave to its toes of iron, and they will blast both Rome and the United States from the face of the Earth (Daniel 2:40-45; Revelation 17:12-18; 18:4-20).
This "peace offensive" was launched by Nikita Khrushchev in 1956, which was the jubilee of Laodicea and America's last opportunity for national repentance, but because of the dramatic diversion of de-Stalinisation it passed largely unnoticed (like the jubilee). The vital importance of Khrushchev's speech at the Twentieth Party Congress was that it inaugurated the strategy of "peaceful coexistence" as the means of achieving worldwide Communist dictatorship—an objective which clearly could not be gained by a conventional military confrontation.
Peaceful coexistence has given the Sovietologists endless material for speculation. But it also led to doubts among rank and file Party members as to the Kremlin's ultimate intentions, and in consequence there has been a great deal of Party literature explaining that peaceful coexistence is simply the final strategy of conquest, the outcome of which "will be the triumph of Communism throughout the entire world".
The element of surprise will emerge when the Eastern satellites turn out,
after all, still to be in the control of hard-line Communists, while at present they are being administered to the West as increasing doses of hypnotics].
Today, China is rapidly accelerating to lead the world in industry and technology. When was the last time you tried to purchase anything that was not manufactured in China? If Communist nations are working at a concerted effort against the West, we have a real problem on our hands. And why would anyone think otherwise?
Christopher Gill speaks of The Perestroika Deception—"It stretches credulity to its absolute bounds to think that suddenly, overnight, all those who were Communists will suddenly adopt a new philosophy and belief, with the result that everything will be different." [Thus the Western Laodiceans, "materially rich but Spiritually wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked," feted Jewish Communist premiers of Russia, Gorbachev, Yeltsin, and Putin].
It must be remembered that the Western Allies were faced with a choice at the conclusion of World War II. After Germany, Italy and Japan were defeated, Russia stood devastated from the German onslaught. The forces of freedom (the good guys) had won [according to the 1871 military blueprint of Tzucom masterminds who also controlled the "bad guys"]. The Western Allies had all six key factors greatly in their favor. At that time, possibly the most important decision in the history of mankind was to be made—to crush Communism or to allow it to live and prosper in a host nation.
General Patton said of the situation—"Russia knows what it wants. World domination. And she is laying her plans accordingly. We, on the other hand, and England, and France to a lesser extent, don't know what we want and get less than nothing as the result."
History is history, the West failed to lead and the future has ensued. As a result, world control remains divided between the Western Allies and the Communists. Free nations will forever pay the consequences.
Fast forward 65 years to the question at hand—Why are we in Afghanistan?
Review this short list of variables regarding the US decision to go into and stay engaged in the Afghanistan War—first focus on the left hand column.
| INITIAL VARIABLES IN DECISION TO GO
|
ADDITIONAL VARIABLES IN DECISION TO STAY
|
| (A) Muslim Extremists (US need to contain) | (A) Muslim Extremists in Afghanistan |
| (B) 6 Key Factors—US Superiority | (B) MIC (Iraq/Afghanistan) |
| (C) American Political Support (in favor of war) | (C) Afghan Political Support |
| (D) American Military Support (in favor of war) | (D) Afghan Military Support |
| (E) American Economic Strength | (E) Afghan Economic Strength |
| (F) American Homeland Secure | (F) Afghan Homeland Secure |
| (G) American Public Support (in favor of war) | (G) Afghan Public Support |
| (H) Recent Attacks in America (i.e. 911) | (H) Recent Attacks in Afghanistan |
If you take away (or greatly reduce) any of the variables in the left column, America would not have gone to Afghanistan in the first place. In a similar sense—taking away (or greatly reducing) any of the right column variables affects the decision to stay. Although, now that America has assumed ownership of Afghanistan, the complexity of the equation has at least doubled—enter the right column.
But what of the objective—Why are we in Afghanistan? What did we go there to do? What are we trying to achieve? How do we define victory? Why are our troops fighting and dying?
The listed variables do not point directly to answers. This is especially the case when you look at the way we are conducting the war—a limited war. Now, take notice that each of the listed variables is formed from the perspective of America as the world leader. Do you see the flaw? The fact that we are conducting the war in a limited fashion is evidence that the United States is not acting as the world's sole superpower. Unknown variables lurk.
In this case, it seems the key unknown variable is the unconsidered enemy—the Communists. Watch as an amazing thing happens. When you factor in Communist influence from the perspective of China, world events begin to make logical sense.
Key Points of Premise:
- Communists are the primary enemy of the United States and the Western Civilization at large.
- Communism and freedom (as defined by the founding documents) cannot coexist.
- Communism is a greater threat to the United States than Islamic Extremism—explanation below.
- The most powerful Communist leaders are currently based in China. Note: There is always a debate as to who is calling the shots (China or Russia). I believe that it is China. But, please, let us set this argument aside. . . It's like arguing over the species of the bear, which gnaws, on your leg. Communists work with communists—they share the common goal.
- Communist leaders actively seek to dominate the world.
- In order to dominate the world, they must strengthen themselves while weakening their enemies.
- Chinese Communist leaders are especially influenced by the teachings of Sun Tzu—to the point of worship.
- Communist leaders are following the philosophies of Sun Tzu and Mao Zedong to achieve their ends. Smartly, they play for keeps.
- One of these philosophies is to take advantage of or influence events (i.e. Muslim Extremism) in order to advance interests (weaken the West) without moving their own troops. That is to lure their enemy's military into distant conflicts in order to distract it and weaken it.
Hypothesis:
We are in Afghanistan partly because our real enemy, The Sun Tzu Communist (Tzucom), has led us into Afghanistan.
Given the current state of the world, it is a mistake to assume the leaders of the United States are doing exactly what it is the leaders of the United States want to do. To make this assumption is to give our leaders too much credit and too great a scope. It is not impossible for Enemy leaders to influence events and directly or indirectly influence the decisions of our leaders—control by proxy—war by proxy.
On the surface, these appear to be wild notions and are difficult to accept. This is not by accident. From the outside, this most clever enemy, that I am attempting to describe, would not have a clear leader, a clear formation or a clear objective. To tip their hand would be foolish. Foolishness is not a trait of the Tzucom.
Sun Tzu says—"O divine art of subtlety and secrecy! Through you we learn to be invisible, through you inaudible; and hence we can hold the enemy's fate in our hands".
[MOSSAD says—"By way of deception, thou shalt do war"].
If this group were to exist—the enemy would be unaware. If the United States were the enemy—the United States would be unaware. If the aim of this group were world dominance—the world would be unaware. To combat deception, one must stick to logic. Ask yourself—why aren't the Chinese fighting the 'War on Terror'?
Think what would happen if a clever enemy were to influence events. Think, then compare. Compare against events recorded in history since 1945.
Sun Tzu says—"lure them out—spread them thin".
How would an enemy accomplish such a thing? How could an enemy lure the United States military? How could an enemy influence world events? —Through business, through banks, through media, through politics… Many are the ways.
Sun Tzu says—"Lure them with gain" [Jeremiah 12:1; I Timothy 6:89-10].
Take a look at the military industrial complex. Most of the factories in the MIC are run as individual business units—much like any other business. Except, to have a good year in the MIC, there needs to be the threat of war—somewhere. And to have a great year in the MIC, projectiles need to fly—somewhere. It would not be difficult for a crafty enemy to lure the MIC with gain. After all—it is all about money. Money can be used in the short term to secure victory over the long term. Tzucoms are thinking long term.
After an influence over business is secure, then business can be counted on to influence politicians, who in turn, can be counted on to influence governmental policy. It's a multi-step process of influence, with each step fueled by the lure of gain. A wealthy, resourceful and determined enemy can influence most any organization it chooses. Bankers, politicians and extremists—easily obtained tools of influence.
So, just what do I mean by securing influence? In simple terms—knowing how your enemy will react to situations and then securing the ability to influence those situations—directing your enemy down the path most favorable to your interests. Sun Tzu refers to this as "directing your enemy's fate".
Ask yourself—how hard would it be to fan the flames of extremism to meet your needs? How hard would it be to lure your enemy into debilitating limited wars—always fought on your terms? If you know your enemy and know yourself, it's not that hard at all. The Tzucom knows America, inside and out. Because, by nature, their plans are long-term, time is on their side. They have the patience to study, to infiltrate, and to wear us down. To distract us, while focusing their energy on building their interests—constantly strengthening their six key factors. This scheme is rather simple for a clever enemy. I imagine that it would be much easier to follow a scheme such as this, than to develop and deploy a strategic missile array or to decipher JN-25. Why then does it seem far-fetched?
The logic of external influence can be applied to explain how each of our limited wars has begun since 1945. Limited wars like Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. Look at history—the Communists were successful against America in both Korea and Vietnam. From the Communist perspective, Korea was a tie and Vietnam was a win. The USSR was defeated in the mountainous regions of Afghanistan. Chinese leaders are knowledgeable and respectful of history. China shares a border with Afghanistan, Korea and Vietnam. If the goal were to weaken the United States—Sun Tzu would say "Lure them into Afghanistan".
The important distinction to make is that the Communists are not fighting a limited war. They are fighting for keeps—as Sun Tzu teaches. To think of Afghanistan as a war in isolation is to think on too small a scale. Afghanistan is only a portion of the puzzle. It is but one of many operations of the larger war—the total war between the Communists and the free nations.
The three components to any action are motive, method, and means. The Communists have the motive, The Art of War outlines their method and the means have been in action for a long time. Free nations are losing this war because they don't know or don't believe or don't want to believe or are being fooled or don't understand who their real enemy is.
Ask yourself—Could Islamic extremists unknowingly act as soldiers of fortune for the Communist movement? Yes. Could they be influenced and used as tools of the Tzucom? Yes. Why?
Ultimately, radical Islam is not a primary threat to Communism. Freedom is the primary threat to Communism. Once freedom is defeated, the Communists can simply purge Islam as they would any other religion. The Tzucom's precedents are Mao in China and Pol Pot in Cambodia. Mosques are easily destroyed after they have fulfilled their purpose. People can be made to worship the State—like they do in China and North Korea, like they did in Germany, and Japan. Anyone found to practice religion could easily be identified and eliminated.
As the Khmer Rouge exterminated Buddhists in Cambodia, they proclaimed—"What is rotten must be removed."
This is the definition of total war—anything it takes to win. For the Tzucom, Muslim extremism is a tool. After all, what cheaper way to create a smart bomb than to sell explosives to a fanatical extremist hell bent on blowing up your enemy?
You see, the real threat to the Tzucom is freedom—America. In order for Communism to spread globally, freedom must be defeated. This is the top priority for the Tzucom. After that, everything is easy. You've heard it before—it was correct then, and it is correct now—like dominos all will fall.
Therefore, it makes sense for Communists to support terrorism. The terrorists will do the dirty work today and are easily purged tomorrow. Today, with the open economy, the dominoes can fall irrespective to national borders.
Near the end of World War II, Patton said—"If we have to fight them, now is the time. From now on, we will get weaker and they will get stronger." At the time, our leadership either didn't want the responsibility—or possibly, even then, were influenced out of the correct course. [America was influenced "out of the correct course" when it signed the 1783 Treaty of Peace with the Tzucom's "City of London" under the guise of Great Britain, and the resulting 1787 Constitution. Even the Corporation (the United States government) does not claim Allodial title, because that office found is with the king, the government has only been vested with fee simple title through the Corporate Charters of the Crown].
Today, the challenge remains with us. Look deeply into Sun Tzu's writings from the Chinese perspective of world dominance. Compare each of his entries to world events since 1945. The proof is there. Communist leaders are following Sun Tzu's philosophies to the letter. These philosophies have worked in the past, they are working today, and they will work in the future. The Tzucoms are well on track to the realization of their wildest dreams.
So, why is the United States fighting in Afghanistan?
We are fighting in Afghanistan because it is the path most beneficial to our enemy.
For burden of proof, we need look no further than Iran. The Judaeo-Communists are known to be the primary suppliers of military arms and training to Iran. [As the most powerful colony of the "City of London" aside from Russia and China] the US military is currently building up forces against Iran. [And] US [Tzucom dual-citizen] hawks are beating the drum to attack. Today's scenario is history [e.g. World Wars I and II] repeated.
Do the Tzucoms want Iran to have a nuclear arsenal?—No. Are the Tzucoms happy to sell Iran items to build a nuclear arsenal?—Yes. Will they be the first to know when Iran is on the brink of creating a successful warhead actually capable of threatening their interests?—Absolutely. When the critical point is reached and military action is necessary, will China or Russia send their troops into Iran? No.—They will send ours.
Then we will ask—"Why is the United States fighting in Iran?" [The answer is Genesis 3:15: God has set the Tzucoms at enmity with Iranians, Americans, Russians, and every soul in Adam's race]. nl659.htm
Pass
it on . . . please send this article to someone you know
Brother Grigor-Scott is a
non-denominational minister who has ministered full-time since 1981, primarily
to other ministers and their congregations in other countries. He pastors
Bible Believers' tiny congregation, and is available to teach in your church.
For Further Information Contact:
|
|
e-mail URL
|
At $78.8 trillion,